Can Suffering Make Me Closer to God? What Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Say

0

AI-generated answers. Same retrieval, same compare prompt, multiple models — compare across tabs. Every citation links to a primary source.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) · 2026-05-14 · same retrieved passages, same compare-format prompt

TL;DR: All three Abrahamic faiths affirm, in different ways, that suffering can become a path toward God rather than away from Him. Judaism sees honest lamentation and communal hardship as occasions for renewed closeness Psalms 73:28Nehemiah 9:32. Christianity frames suffering endured in faith as something to bear without shame, even as a means of glorifying God 1 Peter 4:16. Islam teaches that seeking nearness to God is itself the believer's urgent task, especially in difficulty Quran 17:57. None of the traditions promise suffering is pleasant — but all suggest it needn't be spiritually wasted.

Judaism

"As for me, nearness to God is good; I have made the Sovereign GOD my refuge, that I may recount all Your works." — Psalm 73:28 (JPS Tanakh) Psalms 73:28

Judaism doesn't romanticize pain, but it does take seriously the idea that hardship can reorient a person toward God. The Psalms are the clearest evidence: the psalmist doesn't suppress anguish but brings it directly before God, treating that very act of crying out as a form of closeness Psalms 119:169. Psalm 73 is especially striking — after a long, agonized wrestling with why the wicked prosper, the writer arrives at a simple conclusion: nearness to God is good, and that nearness is the real answer to suffering Psalms 73:28.

The book of Job complicates this further. Job 22:21 offers the counsel to "be close to God and wholehearted" as the path through affliction Job 22:21, though scholars like Moshe Greenberg (20th century) have noted that Job's friends who offer such advice are ultimately rebuked — suggesting Judaism resists easy formulas. The Nehemiah 9 prayer is also instructive: the community explicitly asks God not to treat lightly the suffering they've endured across generations Nehemiah 9:32, implying that suffering is something brought to God in covenant relationship, not explained away.

Rabbinic tradition, particularly in the Talmud (tractate Berakhot), developed the concept of yissurin shel ahavah — "afflictions of love" — the idea that God sometimes allows suffering precisely to deepen a person's spiritual character. It's a contested idea, but it shows the tradition has long grappled with this question honestly.

Christianity

"Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf." — 1 Peter 4:16 (KJV) 1 Peter 4:16

Christianity's answer is shaped decisively by the cross. The suffering of Jesus isn't incidental to Christian theology — it's central. That means suffering, for Christians, is never simply meaningless: it can be a participation in something redemptive. The apostle Peter, writing to communities facing real persecution, tells believers not to be ashamed if they suffer as Christians, but instead to glorify God in it 1 Peter 4:16. That's a striking reframe — suffering becomes an occasion for worship rather than despair.

Paul's letters (Romans 5:3-5, 2 Corinthians 12:9-10) develop this further, arguing that suffering produces perseverance, character, and hope. Theologians like C.S. Lewis in The Problem of Pain (1940) and more recently N.T. Wright have argued that suffering strips away false securities and can make a person genuinely more dependent on — and therefore closer to — God. Lewis famously called pain "God's megaphone to rouse a deaf world."

That said, Christianity doesn't demand cheerfulness about suffering. The Psalms of lament are part of the Christian canon too, and theologians like Walter Brueggemann have argued that suppressing honest grief is actually a spiritual mistake. The tradition holds both: suffering can draw you closer, but only if you bring it honestly to God rather than performing false peace.

Islam

"Those unto whom they cry seek the way of approach to their Lord, which of them shall be the nearest; they hope for His mercy and they fear His doom. Lo! the doom of thy Lord is to be shunned." — Quran 17:57 (Pickthall) Quran 17:57

Islam teaches that seeking nearness (qurb) to God is among the highest spiritual goals, and that trials are one of the primary means by which that nearness is tested and deepened. Quran 17:57 describes the righteous as those who are themselves seeking the way of approach to their Lord — hoping for His mercy and fearing His judgment Quran 17:57. The verse implies that closeness to God isn't automatic; it's pursued, especially under pressure.

The Quran 83:21 references those "brought near unto their Lord" as a mark of spiritual distinction Quran 83:21, and classical scholars like Al-Ghazali (d. 1111 CE) in his Ihya Ulum al-Din wrote extensively on how sabr (patient endurance in hardship) is itself a form of worship that elevates the soul toward God. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported in hadith (Sahih Muslim) to have said that even a thorn that pricks a believer is an expiation — suggesting no suffering is spiritually neutral.

There's genuine scholarly disagreement, though, about whether suffering is always spiritually beneficial or whether it can also harden the heart if met with bitterness rather than trust. The Quranic emphasis is consistently on the response to suffering — gratitude, patience, and turning toward God — rather than on suffering as inherently transformative Quran 17:57.

Where they agree

All three traditions share several core convictions on this question:

  • Suffering isn't the end of the story. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all resist the idea that pain is simply meaningless or that it signals divine abandonment Psalms 73:281 Peter 4:16Quran 17:57.
  • Nearness to God is the real goal. Each tradition frames closeness to God — not the removal of suffering — as the ultimate good Psalms 73:28Quran 17:57Job 22:21.
  • Honest engagement matters. None of the traditions demand that believers pretend to be fine. Lament, petition, and honest prayer in the midst of suffering are all honored practices Psalms 119:169Nehemiah 9:32.
  • Response shapes outcome. Whether suffering draws you closer to God depends significantly on how you meet it — with trust, patience, and continued seeking rather than bitterness or withdrawal.

Where they disagree

DimensionJudaismChristianityIslam
Mechanism of closenessCovenant lament and communal memory Nehemiah 9:32Participation in Christ's suffering; glorifying God through it 1 Peter 4:16Patient endurance (sabr) as active worship Quran 17:57
Role of suffering itselfContested; "afflictions of love" is a real but debated rabbinic conceptCan be redemptive; linked to the cross theologicallyNeutral instrument; the believer's response determines its spiritual value
Key scriptural moodLament and honest wrestling Psalms 73:28Psalms 119:169Reframe suffering as occasion for glorifying God 1 Peter 4:16Urgency of seeking nearness; hope and fear held together Quran 17:57
Classic scholarly voiceMoshe Greenberg on Job's complexityC.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain (1940)Al-Ghazali, Ihya Ulum al-Din (c. 1100 CE)

Key takeaways

  • All three Abrahamic faiths affirm that suffering, when met with honest seeking, can deepen rather than destroy closeness to God Psalms 73:281 Peter 4:16Quran 17:57.
  • Judaism uniquely emphasizes communal lament and covenant memory as the path through suffering, as seen in Nehemiah 9 Nehemiah 9:32.
  • Christianity frames suffering as an opportunity to glorify God, shaped by the theology of the cross and 1 Peter 4:16 1 Peter 4:16.
  • Islam stresses the believer's active response — patient endurance and continued seeking — as what transforms suffering spiritually Quran 17:57.
  • Scholars across traditions (Greenberg, C.S. Lewis, Al-Ghazali) agree that bitterness and withdrawal are the real spiritual dangers, not suffering itself.

FAQs

Does the Bible say suffering brings you closer to God?
The Hebrew Bible strongly implies it. Psalm 73:28 states directly that "nearness to God is good" in the context of the psalmist's own anguished questioning Psalms 73:28, and Job 22:21 counsels closeness to God as the response to affliction Job 22:21. The New Testament reinforces this: 1 Peter 4:16 tells believers to glorify God even in suffering 1 Peter 4:16.
What does Islam say about suffering and closeness to God?
Islam teaches that seeking nearness to God — especially through patient endurance — is the believer's core task, and that trials are part of that journey. Quran 17:57 describes the righteous as actively seeking "the way of approach" to their Lord Quran 17:57, and classical scholars like Al-Ghazali saw sabr in hardship as one of the highest forms of worship.
Is it okay to be angry at God when I'm suffering?
Judaism in particular makes significant room for this. The Psalms repeatedly model honest, even anguished, crying out to God Psalms 119:169, and Nehemiah 9:32 explicitly asks God not to treat communal suffering lightly Nehemiah 9:32. Christianity's inclusion of the Psalms in its canon suggests similar permission. The traditions don't demand performed peace — they invite honest relationship.
Does God cause suffering to bring us closer to Him?
This is genuinely contested across all three traditions. The rabbinic concept of yissurin shel ahavah (afflictions of love) suggests God may allow suffering for spiritual growth, but Job's friends who make similar arguments are rebuked Job 22:21. Christianity and Islam similarly resist simple cause-and-effect formulas, emphasizing instead that God can redeem suffering without necessarily being its direct cause 1 Peter 4:16Quran 17:57.

0 Community answers

No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.

Your answer

Log in or sign up to post a community answer.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated before publishing. Cite a source when you can — that's what makes this site useful.

0/2000