Hard Questions: Where in the Bible Does It Say That? A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Comparison
Judaism
'Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son.' — Genesis 18:14 (KJV) Genesis 18:14
Judaism takes hard questions seriously as a matter of legal and theological duty. The Torah itself anticipates that some matters will be genuinely too difficult for ordinary judges to resolve. Deuteronomy 17:8 commands that when a case is too hard, the people must bring it to the place God chooses — understood by rabbinic tradition as the Sanhedrin, the high court Deuteronomy 17:8. This institutionalized escalation of hard questions is a defining feature of Jewish legal reasoning, or halakha.
At the theological level, hard questions directed at God himself are also part of the tradition. The rhetorical question in Genesis 18:14 — 'Is any thing too hard for the LORD?' — is understood by classical commentators like Rashi (11th century) as an affirmation of divine omnipotence, not a genuine inquiry Genesis 18:14. Similarly, Jeremiah 32:27 repeats the same challenge: nothing is beyond God's power Jeremiah 32:27. Jewish tradition thus frames hard questions as opportunities to deepen faith and sharpen legal reasoning, not as threats to belief.
The Psalms add a devotional dimension, acknowledging that God sometimes answers with 'terrible things in righteousness' — meaning that divine responses to hard questions may be awe-inspiring and difficult to comprehend Psalms 65:5. This honest acknowledgment of mystery is woven throughout Jewish liturgy and theology.
Christianity
'This is an hard saying; who can hear it?' — John 6:60 (KJV) John 6:60
Christianity inherits the Hebrew Bible's hard questions and adds a distinctly Christological layer. In John 6:60, many of Jesus' own disciples reacted to his teaching by saying, 'This is an hard saying; who can hear it?' John 6:60. This moment is pivotal — it shows that hard questions aren't just about legal disputes or divine power, but about the very nature of Jesus' identity and demands. New Testament scholars like N.T. Wright have argued that these 'hard sayings' were intentionally provocative, designed to force a decision about who Jesus was.
Matthew 19 provides two striking examples of hard questions in action. When asked about divorce, Jesus pushes back against a permissive reading of Moses, explaining that the allowance was given 'because of the hardness of your hearts' — not as God's original design Matthew 19:8. And when a rich young man addresses Jesus as 'Good Master,' Jesus responds with a hard question of his own: 'Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God' Matthew 19:17. Theologians from Origen to C.S. Lewis have debated what Jesus meant — was he deflecting, or inviting the man to draw a deeper conclusion about his identity?
Christian tradition, particularly in Catholic and Orthodox streams, holds that the Church's magisterium or councils have authority to resolve hard scriptural questions. Protestant traditions, following the Reformation principle of sola scriptura, insist scripture interprets scripture. The disagreement between these camps is itself one of Christianity's hardest questions.
Islam
'Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me?' — Jeremiah 32:27 (KJV) Jeremiah 32:27
Islam doesn't use the Bible as a primary scriptural authority, but it deeply engages with the same hard questions that appear in the Hebrew and Christian scriptures. The Quran explicitly affirms that nothing is too difficult for Allah — a direct theological parallel to Genesis 18:14 Genesis 18:14 and Jeremiah 32:27 Jeremiah 32:27. Classical Islamic scholars like Ibn Kathir (14th century) noted these convergences as evidence that the original Torah and Injil (Gospel) carried the same divine message before, in the Islamic view, they were altered.
When hard questions arise in Islamic jurisprudence, the tradition turns to the Quran first, then the authenticated hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, then scholarly consensus (ijma), and finally analogical reasoning (qiyas). This structured hierarchy mirrors the Jewish model of escalating hard cases to higher authority Deuteronomy 17:8, though the specific institutions and texts differ fundamentally.
Islam also acknowledges that divine responses can be awe-inspiring and difficult for humans to fully grasp — a sentiment that resonates with Psalms 65:5's reference to God answering 'by terrible things in righteousness' Psalms 65:5. Islamic theology calls this concept jalal, the majestic and sometimes overwhelming aspect of God's nature. Hard questions, in Islamic thought, are an invitation to deeper submission and study, not a challenge to faith's foundations.
Where they agree
- All three traditions affirm that nothing is ultimately too hard or impossible for God, drawing on the rhetorical questions in Genesis 18:14 and Jeremiah 32:27 Genesis 18:14 Jeremiah 32:27.
- All three acknowledge that hard questions in matters of law and judgment require escalation to higher authority or deeper study, reflecting the principle in Deuteronomy 17:8 Deuteronomy 17:8.
- All three traditions accept that divine answers to hard questions may be awe-inspiring or difficult for humans to fully comprehend, resonating with Psalms 65:5 Psalms 65:5.
- All three recognize that human hearts can be hard or resistant, making difficult teachings even harder to receive — a theme explicit in Matthew 19:8 Matthew 19:8 and implicitly present in prophetic literature.
Where they disagree
| Disagreement | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who resolves hard scriptural questions? | The Sanhedrin historically; today, qualified rabbinic authorities following halakhic process Deuteronomy 17:8 | Divided: Catholic/Orthodox say the Church magisterium; Protestants say scripture alone John 6:60 | The Quran, then authenticated hadith, then scholarly consensus (ijma) Deuteronomy 17:8 |
| Are the 'hard sayings' of Jesus authoritative? | No — Jesus is not recognized as a prophet or messiah; his hard sayings carry no binding authority John 6:60 | Yes — Jesus' hard sayings are the Word of God incarnate and must be wrestled with seriously John 6:60 Matthew 19:17 | Jesus (Isa) is a prophet, but the Quran supersedes the Gospels; his hard sayings are filtered through Islamic interpretation John 6:60 |
| What does 'hardness of heart' mean in context? | A legal concession in Mosaic law, not a theological indictment of Israel as a whole Matthew 19:8 | A sign of human sinfulness that Jesus came to address through the new covenant Matthew 19:8 | A condition warned against in the Quran independently; the Matthean context is noted but not binding Matthew 19:8 |
| Is the Bible the final word on hard questions? | The Written Torah requires the Oral Torah (Talmud) to be properly understood Deuteronomy 17:8 | The Bible is the primary authority, though tradition and reason play supporting roles Matthew 19:17 | The Bible in its current form is considered partially corrupted (tahrif); the Quran is the final, uncorrupted word Jeremiah 32:27 |
Key takeaways
- The Bible explicitly asks 'Is any thing too hard for the LORD?' in both Genesis 18:14 and Jeremiah 32:27 — two of the clearest answers to the question of where in the Bible it says nothing is too hard for God Genesis 18:14 Jeremiah 32:27.
- Deuteronomy 17:8 is the Bible's foundational text for escalating hard legal questions to higher authority — a principle that shaped Jewish courts, Christian councils, and Islamic jurisprudence alike Deuteronomy 17:8.
- John 6:60 records that even Jesus' own disciples called his teaching 'an hard saying' — proving that hard questions about scripture are as old as scripture itself John 6:60.
- Matthew 19:8 reveals that some biblical laws were concessions to human 'hardness of heart,' not God's original design — one of the most debated hard questions in Christian theology Matthew 19:8.
- All three Abrahamic faiths agree that God answers hard questions, but may do so with 'terrible things in righteousness' — a phrase from Psalms 65:5 that all three traditions interpret as divine awe and majesty Psalms 65:5.
FAQs
Where in the Bible does it say nothing is too hard for God?
Where does the Bible say to bring hard legal questions to a higher authority?
What did Jesus mean when he said 'Why callest thou me good?'
Where does the Bible acknowledge that some teachings are hard to accept?
Does the Bible address hard questions about divorce?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.