Is It Wrong to Enjoy Worldly Things? What Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Say
Judaism
"There is nothing worthwhile for mortals but to eat and drink and afford themselves enjoyment with their means. And even that, I noted, comes from God." — Ecclesiastes 2:24 (JPS Tanakh) Ecclesiastes 2:24
Jewish scripture presents a notably affirming view of worldly enjoyment, particularly in the wisdom literature. Qohelet (the author of Ecclesiastes) returns again and again to the idea that eating, drinking, and finding satisfaction in one's labor are not sinful indulgences but genuine divine gifts Ecclesiastes 2:24.
Ecclesiastes 3:22 reinforces this: enjoyment of one's portion in life is described as the natural and appropriate human condition, since no one can know what comes after death Ecclesiastes 3:22. This isn't hedonism — it's a sober, even melancholy, acceptance that present enjoyment is meaningful precisely because it comes from God.
That said, the tradition does draw lines. Proverbs 21:17 warns that loving pleasure — making it the organizing principle of one's life — leads to poverty Proverbs 21:17. The Hebrew word there, shemach (sport/pleasure), implies excess rather than ordinary enjoyment. And Ecclesiastes 6:2 notes the bitter irony of a man who has everything his appetite craves yet cannot enjoy it — suggesting that enjoyment itself is a divine permission, not a human right Ecclesiastes 6:2.
Rabbinic tradition, building on these texts, developed the concept that one will be held accountable for refusing legitimate pleasures. The Jerusalem Talmud (Kiddushin 4:12), as cited by scholar David Kraemer in Jewish Eating and Identity Through the Ages (2007), records the view that a person must answer for every permitted pleasure they declined. Worldly enjoyment, properly ordered, is thus a religious obligation, not a concession.
Christianity
"Then I commended mirth, because a man hath no better thing under the sun, than to eat, and to drink, and to be merry: for that shall abide with him of his labour the days of his life, which God giveth him under the sun." — Ecclesiastes 8:15 (KJV) Ecclesiastes 8:15
Christianity inherits the Hebrew Bible's ambivalence about worldly pleasure. On one hand, the Old Testament texts Christians share with Judaism — especially Ecclesiastes — commend moderate enjoyment as God-given Ecclesiastes 8:15. Ecclesiastes 8:15 is striking in its directness: the author doesn't merely permit mirth, he commends it, calling eating and drinking the best thing available to humans under the sun Ecclesiastes 8:15.
On the other hand, the New Testament introduces a sharper eschatological urgency. Paul warns against those who are "lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God" (2 Timothy 3:4, KJV), and Jesus famously warns that one cannot serve both God and mammon (Matthew 6:24). The concern isn't that creation is bad — Christian theology, especially since Irenaeus of Lyon (c. 180 CE), has strongly affirmed creation's goodness — but that disordered attachment to worldly things crowds out devotion to God.
Theologians have disagreed sharply here. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) was suspicious of sensory pleasure, linking it to concupiscence. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE), by contrast, argued in the Summa Theologica that moderate enjoyment of created goods is not only permissible but reflects proper appreciation of God's gifts. The Reformation broadly followed Aquinas on this point; John Calvin affirmed that God "created food not only for our necessity but also for our delight."
Proverbs 21:17's warning against loving pleasure — which Christians also read as canonical — sets the boundary: enjoyment is fine, but making pleasure one's chief end is not Proverbs 21:17.
Islam
"And whatever thing you [people] have been given - it is [only for] the enjoyment of worldly life and its adornment. And what is with Allāh is better and more lasting; so will you not use reason?" — Qur'an 28:60 (Sahih International) Quran 28:60
Islam doesn't condemn worldly enjoyment outright, but the Qur'an consistently frames it as temporary and inferior to what awaits believers with Allāh. Surah 28:60 is representative: worldly goods are real, they're described as "enjoyment" and "adornment," but the passage immediately pivots — what is with Allāh is "better and more lasting" Quran 28:60.
Surah 42:36 repeats this structure almost verbatim, addressing believers specifically: worldly enjoyment is acknowledged, but those who believe and rely on their Lord are oriented toward something greater Quran 42:36. The rhetorical pattern — concede the reality of worldly pleasure, then redirect — is a recurring Qur'anic technique.
Surah 87:16 is more pointed, noting simply that humans "prefer the worldly life" — framing this preference as a spiritual problem rather than a neutral fact Quran 87:16. Classical scholars like Al-Ghazali (1058–1111 CE), in his Ihya Ulum al-Din, developed this into a full theology of zuhd (detachment), arguing that worldly enjoyment isn't sinful per se but becomes dangerous when it distracts from the hereafter.
Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) distinguishes between halal pleasures — food, marriage, beauty, rest — which are not only permitted but sometimes encouraged as sunnah — and those that are haram. The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) reportedly said, "Your body has a right over you" (Sahih Bukhari), indicating that self-denial isn't the Islamic ideal either. The key is balance and gratitude (shukr), not renunciation.
Where they agree
All three traditions share a core position: worldly enjoyment is not inherently wrong, but it must be properly ordered. Each tradition affirms that created goods — food, drink, beauty, rest — come ultimately from God and carry real value. Each also warns against making pleasure the supreme goal of life, whether through the Hebrew Bible's warning about loving pleasure Proverbs 21:17, Christianity's concern about serving mammon, or Islam's repeated reminder that what is with Allāh is better and more lasting Quran 42:36. The shared instinct is moderation and gratitude, not asceticism.
Where they disagree
| Dimension | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tone toward enjoyment | Actively affirming; Ecclesiastes commends mirth repeatedly Ecclesiastes 8:15 | Mixed; ranges from Augustinian suspicion to Calvinist affirmation | Cautiously permissive; enjoyment acknowledged but consistently relativized Quran 28:60 |
| Primary concern | Excess and idolatry of pleasure Proverbs 21:17 | Disordered love; placing pleasure above God | Preference for worldly life over the hereafter Quran 87:16 |
| Eschatological urgency | Lower; focus is on present life under the sun Ecclesiastes 3:22 | High in New Testament; creation still good but passing away | Very high; worldly life explicitly contrasted with eternal reward Quran 42:36 |
| Asceticism valued? | Generally no; refusing permitted pleasures may be blameworthy (Talmudic tradition) | Debated; monastic traditions value it, Reformed traditions less so | Not the ideal; balance (mizan) preferred over renunciation |
Key takeaways
- All three Abrahamic faiths permit worldly enjoyment; none flatly condemn it as sinful.
- Judaism's Ecclesiastes is the most affirming, repeatedly commending eating, drinking, and mirth as God-given goods Ecclesiastes 8:15.
- Islam consistently acknowledges worldly enjoyment but frames it as temporary and inferior to divine reward [[cite:5], [cite:6]].
- The shared boundary across traditions is disordered love — making pleasure the supreme goal rather than enjoying it gratefully within a God-centered life Proverbs 21:17.
- Scholars like Al-Ghazali (Islam) and Thomas Aquinas (Christianity) both concluded that moderate enjoyment of created goods is not only permitted but reflects proper appreciation of God's gifts.
FAQs
Does the Bible say enjoying life is a sin?
What does the Quran say about enjoying worldly things?
Is there a Jewish concept that refusing pleasure is wrong?
Is enjoying wealth wrong according to scripture?
Judaism
Then I commended mirth, because a man hath no better thing under the sun, than to eat, and to drink, and to be merry: for that shall abide with him of his labour the days of his life, which God giveth him under the sun.
Ecclesiastes repeatedly permits and even commends joy in ordinary goods—food, drink, and gladness—as part of one’s portion from God Ecclesiastes 8:15Ecclesiastes 2:24Ecclesiastes 3:22. Yet the same wisdom corpus warns that loving pleasure for its own sake leads to loss and emptiness, signaling a boundary between grateful enjoyment and hedonism Proverbs 21:17Isaiah 44:9. Readers also notice a tension inside Ecclesiastes: it blesses enjoyment as a gift, but laments when someone is unable to enjoy what they have, underscoring life’s fragility and the need for balance Ecclesiastes 2:24Ecclesiastes 3:22Ecclesiastes 6:2. In short, enjoyment isn’t wrong; unwise attachment is Ecclesiastes 8:15Proverbs 21:17.
Christianity
He that loveth pleasure shall be a poor man: he that loveth wine and oil shall not be rich.
Christian readings of the shared wisdom books affirm that enjoying created goods can be proper when received as part of one’s portion under God, while cautioning that love of pleasure corrodes integrity and outcomes Ecclesiastes 8:15Proverbs 21:17. Ecclesiastes’ call to eat, drink, and find joy in one’s labor sits beside warnings about the limits of such goods, encouraging gratitude without making pleasure an idol Ecclesiastes 8:15Isaiah 44:9. Thus, enjoyment is permissible, but it shouldn’t rule the heart Proverbs 21:17.
Islam
And whatever thing you [people] have been given - it is [only for] the enjoyment of worldly life and its adornment. And what is with Allāh is better and more lasting; so will you not use reason?
The Qur’an describes worldly enjoyments as temporary adornments that many prefer, yet it repeatedly reminds that what is with God is better and more lasting Quran 87:16Quran 28:60Quran 42:36. Believers are urged to enjoy within faith and reliance on God while not letting the fleeting eclipse the eternal Quran 42:36. The contrast frames enjoyment as allowable but subordinate to the pursuit of what endures with God Quran 28:60Quran 42:36.
Where they agree
All three traditions allow some enjoyment of worldly goods but warn against making pleasure ultimate or preferring the fleeting over the lasting Ecclesiastes 8:15Proverbs 21:17Quran 42:36. Each stresses gratitude and limits: joy as portion from God in the wisdom texts, and as temporary adornment in the Qur’an Ecclesiastes 8:15Ecclesiastes 2:24Quran 42:36.
Where they disagree
| Theme | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary emphasis | Enjoy your portion as God’s gift amid life’s limits Ecclesiastes 8:15Ecclesiastes 2:24Ecclesiastes 3:22. | Receive permitted joys but resist love of pleasure that undermines life Ecclesiastes 8:15Proverbs 21:17. | Worldly life is passing adornment; what is with God is better and lasting Quran 28:60Quran 42:36. |
| Risk highlighted | Inability to enjoy or loss to others reveals futility when detached from God’s gift Ecclesiastes 6:2. | Poverty of soul and outcome when pleasure is loved for itself Proverbs 21:17. | Preferring the worldly over the eternal leads to misprioritization Quran 87:16. |
Key takeaways
- Judaism commends measured enjoyment—eat, drink, and rejoice—as a God-given portion Ecclesiastes 8:15Ecclesiastes 2:24Ecclesiastes 3:22.
- Both Jewish and Christian wisdom warn that loving pleasure can impoverish and mislead Proverbs 21:17.
- Islam frames worldly goods as fleeting adornments; what is with God is better and lasting Quran 28:60Quran 42:36.
- Scripture contrasts grateful enjoyment with idolatrous attachment or preference for the merely worldly Isaiah 44:9Quran 87:16.
FAQs
Does the Hebrew Bible permit enjoyment of food and drink?
Is loving pleasure condemned?
How does the Qur’an view worldly enjoyments?
Is there tension about enjoyment within Ecclesiastes?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.