Questions About the Bible and Answers: What Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Say

0

AI-generated answers. Same retrieval, same compare prompt, multiple models — compare across tabs. Every citation links to a primary source.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) · 2026-05-12 · same retrieved passages, same compare-format prompt

TL;DR: All three Abrahamic faiths engage seriously with questions about scripture and divine revelation, though from very different angles. Judaism treats the Hebrew Bible as the living word of God, with Deuteronomy and the prophets offering guidance on how to test authentic divine speech Deuteronomy 18:21. Christianity inherits this canon and adds the New Testament. Islam acknowledges earlier scriptures but insists the Qur'an supersedes them as the final, uncorrupted revelation Sahih al Bukhari 7522. Disagreements center on canon, authenticity, and whether earlier texts remain authoritative.

Judaism

"And should you ask yourselves, 'How can we know that the oracle was not spoken by GOD?'" — Deuteronomy 18:21 (JPS Tanakh) Deuteronomy 18:21

Judaism places the act of questioning scripture at the very heart of religious life. The Talmudic tradition — codified by sages like Rabbi Akiva in the 2nd century CE — treats vigorous debate over biblical texts not as doubt but as devotion. Questions about the Bible aren't just permitted; they're expected.

One of the most practically urgent questions the Hebrew Bible itself raises is: how do you know whether a prophetic oracle is genuinely from God? Deuteronomy addresses this head-on, asking "How can we know that the oracle was not spoken by GOD?" Deuteronomy 18:21 — and the answer it provides is essentially empirical: a prophecy that fails to come true wasn't divine. This is a remarkably rational framework for a pre-modern text.

Isaiah deepens the epistemological stakes. The rhetorical questions in Isaiah 40 — "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning?" Isaiah 40:21 — presuppose that divine truth has been accessible all along, embedded in creation itself. The implication is that asking questions about God and scripture is a natural human response to observable reality, not a sign of faithlessness.

Isaiah 48 adds a fascinating wrinkle: some things are genuinely new revelations, created in the present moment so that no one can falsely claim prior knowledge Isaiah 48:7. This suggests the biblical authors were aware of the tension between tradition and fresh divine speech — a tension Jewish commentators like Rashi (11th century) and Maimonides (12th century) continued wrestling with for centuries.

The prophet Jeremiah frames the question even more directly in a liturgical context: "What did GOD answer you?" Jeremiah 23:37 — treating the act of seeking God's word as an ongoing, dialogical practice rather than a one-time deposit of truth.

Christianity

"Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?" — Isaiah 40:21 (KJV) Isaiah 40:21

Christianity inherits the entire Hebrew Bible as its Old Testament and adds the New Testament, making questions about the Bible central to Christian theology and practice. The same passages that Judaism wrestles with — Isaiah's rhetorical challenges, Deuteronomy's test of prophecy — carry over into Christian interpretation, though often reframed through a Christological lens.

Isaiah 40:21's series of pointed questions — "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?" Isaiah 40:21 — is read by many Christian commentators, including John Calvin in the 16th century, as an indictment of human spiritual blindness and a call to recognize God's sovereignty through both creation and scripture.

The question of how to distinguish true prophecy from false, raised in Deuteronomy 18:21 Deuteronomy 18:21, became especially significant in early Christianity as the church debated which texts were canonical. Scholars like Origen (3rd century) and later the Council of Carthage (397 CE) worked to establish authoritative answers about which books belonged in the Bible — itself a response to the very question the text poses.

Isaiah 48:7's assertion that some revelations are genuinely new Isaiah 48:7 resonates with Christian claims about the New Testament as a fresh, fulfilling word from God — not contradicting the old but completing it. This is a point of significant internal debate: Protestant reformers like Luther emphasized sola scriptura, while Catholic and Orthodox traditions hold that scripture and church tradition together answer questions about biblical meaning.

Islam

"O People of the Scripture! Why will ye argue about Abraham, when the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have ye then no sense?" — Qur'an 3:65 (Pickthall) Quran 3:65

Islam's relationship to the Bible is complex and worth understanding carefully. Muslims don't reject the Bible outright — they believe the Torah (Tawrat) and Gospel (Injil) were originally genuine divine revelations. But mainstream Islamic scholarship holds that these texts were corrupted over time, making the Qur'an the only fully reliable scripture available today.

Ibn Abbas, one of the most respected companions of the Prophet Muhammad, put it bluntly: "How can you ask the people of the Scriptures about their Books while you have Allah's Book (the Qur'an) which is the most recent of the Books revealed by Allah, and you read it in its pure undistorted form?" Sahih al Bukhari 7522 This isn't a dismissal of earlier scripture in principle — it's a practical argument that the Qur'an supersedes it in reliability.

The Qur'an itself challenges the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) on their use of scripture. Surah 3:65 asks pointedly: "O People of the Scripture! Why will ye argue about Abraham, when the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have ye then no sense?" Quran 3:65 This verse is often cited by scholars like Ibn Kathir (14th century) to argue that even sincere questions about the Bible can go astray when the questioner's framework is flawed.

Surah 68:37 presses the challenge further, asking: "Or do you have a scripture in which you learn" Quran 68:37 — a rhetorical question implying that certain claims made on the basis of earlier scriptures lack divine warrant. From an Islamic perspective, then, the best answers to questions about the Bible come from the Qur'an itself, not from the biblical text as currently preserved.

Where they agree

All three traditions agree on several foundational points. First, divine revelation is real and knowable — scripture isn't merely human literature but carries genuine divine authority Isaiah 40:21 Sahih al Bukhari 7522. Second, all three traditions acknowledge that asking questions about scripture is legitimate and even necessary; Deuteronomy explicitly models this Deuteronomy 18:21, and Islamic scholarship likewise encourages rigorous inquiry, provided it starts from the right source Sahih al Bukhari 7522. Third, all three agree that false or distorted religious claims are a genuine danger — whether that's false prophecy (Deuteronomy 18:21 Deuteronomy 18:21), misuse of earlier scripture (Qur'an 3:65 Quran 3:65), or misreading creation itself (Isaiah 40:21 Isaiah 40:21).

Where they disagree

IssueJudaismChristianityIslam
Which books constitute authoritative scripture?The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) — 24 books in the Jewish canonOld Testament + New Testament (canon varies: Protestant 66, Catholic 73, Orthodox more)The Qur'an alone is fully reliable; earlier scriptures are acknowledged but considered corrupted Sahih al Bukhari 7522
How do you test a true oracle or revelation?Empirical fulfillment of prophecy — Deuteronomy 18:21 Deuteronomy 18:21Fulfillment of prophecy + alignment with church tradition and New TestamentConformity with the Qur'an, which is self-authenticating Quran 68:37
Are new revelations possible after the canon closed?Generally no — prophecy ended with Malachi in mainstream rabbinic thoughtGenerally no after the New Testament, though charismatic traditions disagreeNo — Muhammad is the Seal of the Prophets; the Qur'an is final Sahih al Bukhari 7522
What do Isaiah's rhetorical questions mean?A call to recognize God through creation and history Isaiah 40:21An indictment of human blindness, fulfilled in ChristNot a primary reference point; the Qur'an's own rhetorical questions (e.g., 68:37 Quran 68:37) serve this function

Key takeaways

  • The Bible itself models questioning — Deuteronomy 18:21 asks how to distinguish true from false prophecy, and Isaiah 40:21 uses rhetorical questions to challenge readers to think Deuteronomy 18:21 Isaiah 40:21.
  • Judaism treats vigorous questioning of scripture as a religious duty, rooted in centuries of Talmudic debate and prophetic literature Jeremiah 23:37.
  • Christianity inherits the Hebrew Bible's questions and reframes them through the lens of the New Testament and church tradition, with ongoing internal debate about how to answer them.
  • Islam acknowledges the Bible's origins as divine revelation but holds — per Ibn Abbas — that the Qur'an is the only fully reliable scripture available today Sahih al Bukhari 7522.
  • All three traditions agree that false or distorted religious claims are dangerous, and each has internal mechanisms for testing the authenticity of divine speech Deuteronomy 18:21 Quran 3:65.

FAQs

Does the Bible itself tell you how to know if a prophecy is from God?
Yes — Deuteronomy 18:21 raises this exact question: "How can we know that the oracle was not spoken by GOD?" Deuteronomy 18:21 The answer given is that a prophecy failing to come true reveals it wasn't divine. This is one of the Bible's own internal quality-control mechanisms.
What does Islam say about asking questions from the Bible?
Ibn Abbas, a companion of the Prophet, discouraged Muslims from consulting the Bible for religious answers, arguing that the Qur'an — as the most recent and uncorrupted divine revelation — is sufficient Sahih al Bukhari 7522. The Qur'an also challenges the People of the Book on their use of earlier scripture Quran 3:65.
Does the Bible acknowledge that some revelations are genuinely new?
Yes. Isaiah 48:7 states that some things "are created now, and not from the beginning" Isaiah 48:7, specifically so no one can falsely claim they already knew them. This suggests the biblical authors distinguished between ancient tradition and fresh divine speech.
Why does Isaiah ask so many rhetorical questions?
Isaiah 40:21 strings together four rhetorical questions — "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?" Isaiah 40:21 — to emphasize that knowledge of God's power is not hidden but has always been available through creation and tradition.
Does the Qur'an challenge people to examine their scriptures?
Yes, in a critical way. Qur'an 68:37 asks rhetorically, "Or do you have a scripture in which you learn" Quran 68:37, implying that certain claims lack genuine scriptural backing. And Qur'an 3:65 challenges Jews and Christians for arguing about Abraham using scriptures that post-date him Quran 3:65.

0 Community answers

No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.

Your answer

Log in or sign up to post a community answer.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated before publishing. Cite a source when you can — that's what makes this site useful.

0/2000