What Does the Torah Say About Enemies? A Three-Faith Comparison

0

AI-assisted, scholar-reviewed. Comparative answer with citations across all three traditions.

TL;DR: All three Abrahamic faiths acknowledge the reality of enemies and affirm divine protection against them. The Torah promises God will fight Israel's enemies if they obey His voice Exodus 23:22, and curses will fall on those who persecute His people Deuteronomy 30:7. Christianity reframes enemy-love as a central ethic, while Islam balances justice with mercy. The biggest disagreement is whether believers should hate enemies (as Psalm 139:22 expresses Psalms 139:22) or actively love and pray for them.

Judaism

'But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries.' — Exodus 23:22 Exodus 23:22

The Torah and the broader Hebrew Bible treat enemies as a concrete, lived reality — not an abstraction. The Psalms are saturated with honest cries about foes who are many and who 'hate with cruel hatred' Psalms 25:19. This raw honesty is itself considered spiritually legitimate within Jewish tradition; the psalmist doesn't suppress the emotion but brings it before God.

Crucially, the Torah frames divine protection as conditional on obedience. Exodus 23:22 makes the covenant explicit: if Israel obeys God's voice, He becomes an enemy to their enemies Exodus 23:22. Deuteronomy reinforces this, promising that God will cause enemies who rise up against Israel to be smitten and flee in seven directions Deuteronomy 28:7, and that He will place curses upon those who persecuted His people Deuteronomy 30:7.

Rabbinic tradition, however, complicates any simple 'destroy your enemies' reading. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 39b) records God rebuking the angels for celebrating at the drowning of the Egyptians — 'My creatures are drowning and you sing songs?' Maimonides (12th century) and later scholars emphasized that even enemy-defeat should not be celebrated as an end in itself. The Torah also commands (Exodus 23:4–5) that one must return an enemy's lost ox — a striking ethic of practical compassion even toward personal foes, though this passage isn't in the retrieved corpus.

Psalm 139:22 expresses what scholars like Jon Levenson call 'imprecatory' spirituality — a perfect, total hatred toward those who oppose God Psalms 139:22. This is understood in context as zeal for God rather than personal vengeance, but it remains one of the most theologically charged verses in the Hebrew Bible and is debated by Jewish commentators to this day.

Christianity

'The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways.' — Deuteronomy 28:7 Deuteronomy 28:7

Christianity inherits the Torah's enemy-texts but dramatically recontextualizes them through the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:43–44), where the command 'love your enemies' overturns any simple reading of passages like Psalm 139:22 Psalms 139:22. Early church fathers, including Origen (3rd century) and Augustine (4th–5th century), wrestled with how to reconcile the imprecatory Psalms with the New Testament ethic of enemy-love.

Christian interpreters typically read the Torah's promises of divine vengeance — such as God smiting enemies who rise against Israel Deuteronomy 28:7 — as either historically specific to ancient Israel's national covenant or as typological, pointing forward to spiritual warfare against sin and evil rather than literal human foes. The promise in Deuteronomy 30:7 that God will put curses on Israel's persecutors Deuteronomy 30:7 is often read eschatologically, as referring to final divine judgment rather than present retaliation.

The Psalms remain central to Christian worship, and the lament tradition — crying out about enemies who are many and who hate with cruel hatred Psalms 25:19 — is embraced as honest prayer. However, most mainstream Christian traditions, from Catholic to Reformed, teach that the believer's response to enemies must be shaped by grace, not retaliation. The New Testament's Romans 12:20 quotes Proverbs: 'If your enemy is hungry, feed him.'

There's genuine disagreement within Christianity: some traditions (e.g., certain strands of Christian nationalism) lean heavily on the Torah's warfare texts, while others (Anabaptists, Quakers) hold to near-absolute pacifism. The tension between the Torah's enemy-defeat promises Exodus 23:22 and Jesus's enemy-love command remains one of the most live debates in Christian ethics.

Islam

'And the LORD thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies, and on them that hate thee, which persecuted thee.' — Deuteronomy 30:7 Deuteronomy 30:7

Islam affirms the Torah (Tawrat) as a revealed scripture, though Muslims believe it has been partially altered over time. The Quran itself addresses enemies extensively, balancing justice with mercy. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:190) permits fighting those who fight you but forbids transgression — a principle that echoes the Torah's conditional framing in Exodus 23:22 Exodus 23:22, where divine enmity toward enemies is tied to Israel's obedience to God's voice.

The Quran's vision of God protecting believers against their enemies resonates with Deuteronomy 6:19's promise to cast out all enemies Deuteronomy 6:19 and Deuteronomy 30:7's assurance that God will turn curses upon persecutors Deuteronomy 30:7. Islamic theology strongly affirms that God is the ultimate defender of the faithful (Al-Mawla, 'the Protector'), and the concept of divine justice against oppressors is a recurring Quranic theme.

Where Islam diverges from the raw imprecatory emotion of Psalm 139:22 Psalms 139:22 is in its strong emphasis on restraint and forgiveness as spiritually superior responses. The Prophet Muhammad (d. 632 CE) famously prayed for his enemies at Ta'if rather than calling down destruction. Scholar Tariq Ramadan and classical jurists like Al-Ghazali (11th century) both emphasize that while self-defense is legitimate, cultivating hatred toward enemies is spiritually corrosive.

Islamic jurisprudence also distinguishes between personal enemies and enemies of the community (ummah), with different ethical obligations applying to each. The Torah's promise that enemies will 'flee before thee seven ways' Deuteronomy 28:7 is read by Muslim commentators as a historical narrative about the Israelites rather than a universal promise, though God's protection of the faithful is affirmed as a universal principle.

Where they agree

  • All three faiths affirm that God sees and judges enemies who act with cruelty or hatred Psalms 25:19, and that divine justice will ultimately prevail Deuteronomy 30:7.
  • All three traditions recognize the reality of unjust enemies — those who 'hate without a cause' Psalms 35:19 — and validate the believer's cry for divine help.
  • All three affirm a conditional logic: obedience to God is connected to divine protection against enemies Exodus 23:22.
  • All three traditions include a strand of thought warning against celebrating enemy-defeat as an end in itself, rooted in the broader covenantal ethics of the Torah Deuteronomy 6:19.

Where they disagree

IssueJudaismChristianityIslam
Hating enemiesImprecatory psalms like Ps. 139:22 are spiritually legitimate expressions of zeal for God Psalms 139:22Enemy-love (Matt. 5:44) reframes or supersedes imprecatory hatred Psalms 139:22Hatred toward enemies is spiritually corrosive; restraint and forgiveness are superior, though justice is permitted
Divine warfare promisesDeuteronomy's promises of God smiting enemies Deuteronomy 28:7 are part of the living covenantThese promises are historically specific to Israel or typological of spiritual warfare Deuteronomy 28:7Affirmed as historical narrative for Israel; God's protection of believers is universal but not tied to these specific texts Deuteronomy 30:7
Scope of 'enemies'Primarily national/communal enemies of Israel, with some personal application Deuteronomy 6:19Reframed as primarily spiritual enemies (sin, evil), with personal enemies to be lovedDistinguishes personal enemies from enemies of the ummah, with different ethics for each Exodus 23:22
Response to persecutionGod will curse persecutors; righteous anger is valid Deuteronomy 30:7Pray for persecutors; vengeance belongs to God alone (Romans 12:19) Psalms 25:19Self-defense is legitimate; forgiveness is spiritually superior; the Prophet's example at Ta'if is normative

Key takeaways

  • The Torah promises God will become 'an enemy unto thine enemies' if Israel obeys His voice — making divine protection explicitly conditional on faithfulness (Exodus 23:22) Exodus 23:22.
  • Psalm 139:22's 'perfect hatred' toward enemies Psalms 139:22 is one of the most theologically contested verses across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — each tradition interprets it very differently.
  • Deuteronomy 28:7 promises enemies will flee 'seven ways' Deuteronomy 28:7 — a hyperbolic expression of total divine victory that Judaism reads covenantally, Christianity reads typologically, and Islam reads historically.
  • All three faiths validate the cry of the persecuted believer facing enemies who 'hate without a cause' Psalms 35:19, but they diverge sharply on whether the proper response is hatred, love, or measured justice.
  • The Torah's promise that God will put curses on persecutors (Deuteronomy 30:7) Deuteronomy 30:7 is affirmed across all three traditions as evidence of divine justice, though its application to contemporary believers is debated.

FAQs

Does the Torah command believers to destroy their enemies?
It's more nuanced than a simple 'yes.' The Torah promises divine protection and that God will cause enemies to flee Deuteronomy 28:7, and commands the casting out of enemies from the land Deuteronomy 6:19. But these are framed as God's action, conditional on Israel's obedience Exodus 23:22. Rabbinic tradition, drawing on texts like Exodus 23:4–5, also commands practical compassion toward personal enemies, creating a complex ethical picture.
What does Psalm 139:22 mean when it says 'I hate them with perfect hatred'?
Psalm 139:22 — 'I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies' Psalms 139:22 — is an 'imprecatory' psalm expressing total zeal for God against those who oppose Him. Jewish commentators generally read this as religious devotion rather than personal vengeance. Christian interpreters often read it as a spiritual metaphor for hating sin. It remains one of the most debated verses across all three traditions.
Do all three Abrahamic faiths agree that God protects believers from enemies?
Yes — this is one of their clearest points of agreement. The Torah promises God will be 'an enemy unto thine enemies' Exodus 23:22, will smite those who rise against Israel Deuteronomy 28:7, and will place curses on persecutors Deuteronomy 30:7. Christianity and Islam both affirm divine protection, though they differ on how literally to apply these specific Torah promises to contemporary believers.
Does the Torah say anything about enemies who hate without cause?
Yes. Psalm 35:19 explicitly addresses enemies who act 'wrongfully' — the Hebrew implies falsely or without just cause — and asks God not to let them rejoice Psalms 35:19. Psalm 25:19 similarly describes enemies who 'hate me with cruel hatred' Psalms 25:19. These texts validate the experience of unjust persecution and frame it as a matter for divine justice rather than personal retaliation.
How does Islam view the Torah's promises about enemies?
Islam affirms the Torah as originally revealed scripture and resonates with its themes of divine protection against enemies Deuteronomy 30:7 and God's enmity toward those who oppose His obedient servants Exodus 23:22. However, Islamic theology generally reads the specific military promises of Deuteronomy Deuteronomy 28:7 as historically particular to the Israelites, while extracting the universal principle that God defends the faithful.

0 Community answers

No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.

Your answer

Log in or sign up to post a community answer.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated before publishing. Cite a source when you can — that's what makes this site useful.

0/2000