What Does the Torah Say About Killing? A Comparative Religious Overview
Judaism
Thou shalt not kill. — Exodus 20:13 (KJV) Exodus 20:13
The Torah's stance on killing is anchored in one of the Ten Commandments, appearing twice in the Hebrew text: lo tirtzach — typically translated 'thou shalt not kill' but more precisely rendered 'thou shalt not murder.' Exodus 20:13 Deuteronomy 5:17 The Hebrew root ratzach (Strong's H7523) specifically denotes unlawful killing, meaning the commandment targets murder rather than all forms of taking life.
This distinction matters enormously in rabbinic interpretation. The Torah itself permits capital punishment, warfare, and killing in self-defense — categories that fall outside the prohibition. Deuteronomy 27:25 reinforces the moral gravity of unjust killing from another angle: 'Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person.' Deuteronomy 27:25 This verse targets contract killing or judicial corruption — condemning those who pervert justice to cause an innocent death.
The Mishnah in tractate Sanhedrin reflects how seriously the rabbis took extrajudicial killing, even permitting zealous intervention in certain extreme cases of public desecration — though these were tightly bounded exceptions, not general licenses. Mishnah Sanhedrin 9:6 Scholar Jacob Milgrom (writing in the late 20th century) argued that the Torah's homicide laws were revolutionary in the ancient Near East precisely because they rejected ransom as a substitute for justice in murder cases.
The broader legal framework of the Torah treats human life as bearing a sanctity that cannot be monetized or casually extinguished. Killing an innocent person carries a curse; killing through corrupt judicial means is equally condemned. Deuteronomy 27:25
Christianity
Thou shalt not kill. — Deuteronomy 5:17 (KJV) Deuteronomy 5:17
Christianity receives the Torah's prohibition on killing as part of the moral law that Jesus himself affirmed. The commandment 'thou shalt not kill' appears in Deuteronomy 5:17 and is quoted directly in the New Testament by Jesus in Matthew 19:18. Deuteronomy 5:17 Christians have historically understood this commandment as binding on believers, though theological traditions diverge on its application to war, capital punishment, and self-defense.
The Deuteronomic curse on those who accept payment to kill the innocent — 'Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person' — resonates strongly in Christian ethics as well, reinforcing the idea that human life holds intrinsic, God-given value. Deuteronomy 27:25 Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) and later Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE) developed Just War theory partly in response to the tension between this commandment and the realities of governance and defense.
It's worth noting that Christian denominations disagree significantly here. Pacifist traditions like the Quakers and Mennonites read 'thou shalt not kill' as an absolute prohibition. Mainline Protestant and Catholic traditions allow for exceptions under just war and self-defense doctrines. The commandment's moral weight, however, is universally acknowledged across Christianity.
Islam
And slay not the life which Allah hath forbidden save with right. Whoso is slain wrongfully, We have given power unto his heir, but let him not commit excess in slaying. Lo! he will be helped. — Quran 17:33 (Pickthall) Quran 17:33
Islam isn't directly bound by the Torah, but the Quran articulates a strikingly parallel prohibition on unjust killing. Quran 17:33 states: 'And slay not the life which Allah hath forbidden save with right.' Quran 17:33 This mirrors the Torah's distinction between murder and lawful killing — both traditions permit killing under defined just circumstances while absolutely forbidding unjust taking of life.
The Quran goes further in 17:33 by addressing the rights of a murder victim's family, granting them legal authority while cautioning against excess in retaliation Quran 17:33 — a framework that parallels the Torah's concern with justice rather than vengeance. Ibn Abbas, one of the earliest Quranic commentators (d. 68 AH), clarified in a hadith recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari that intentional murder of a believer carries the punishment of Hell, though repentance remains a theological question debated among scholars. Sahih al Bukhari 3855
Islamic jurisprudence, like Jewish law, distinguishes categories of killing — murder (qatl al-amd), manslaughter, and lawful killing — echoing the Torah's nuanced legal framework even though the two traditions developed independently.
Where they agree
All three traditions agree on several core points. First, the unjust killing of an innocent person is among the gravest moral violations a human being can commit Deuteronomy 5:17 Exodus 20:13 Quran 17:33. Second, the prohibition isn't absolute in the sense of covering all killing — lawful exceptions exist in each tradition, including self-defense and just punishment. Third, the killing of an innocent for personal gain (e.g., hired murder or corrupt judgment) is explicitly cursed or condemned Deuteronomy 27:25 Sahih al Bukhari 3855. Human life is treated as sacred, not to be extinguished without serious moral and legal justification.
Where they disagree
| Issue | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source of authority | Torah + Talmudic law (rabbinic elaboration) | Torah inherited through Old Testament; New Testament ethics layer on top | Quran + Hadith; Torah not directly binding |
| Capital punishment | Permitted under strict rabbinic conditions; Sanhedrin debates made it rare | Debated; Catholic and mainline traditions permit it; some denominations oppose | Permitted under Islamic law for defined offenses |
| Zealous extrajudicial killing | Narrow Mishnaic exceptions exist for extreme public desecration Mishnah Sanhedrin 9:6 | Generally not recognized; justice delegated to state | Not sanctioned outside legal process |
| Repentance after murder | Atonement possible but does not remove legal liability | Forgiveness available through repentance and grace | Debated; Ibn Abbas held intentional murder of a believer leads to Hell, though repentance is discussed Sahih al Bukhari 3855 |
Key takeaways
- The Torah's 'thou shalt not kill' (Exodus 20:13, Deuteronomy 5:17) uses the Hebrew word ratzach, meaning murder — not all killing — making context and intent central to interpretation.
- The Torah explicitly curses anyone who accepts payment to kill an innocent person (Deuteronomy 27:25), highlighting that corrupt or mercenary killing is especially condemned.
- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all prohibit unjust killing, but each tradition has developed distinct legal frameworks for permissible exceptions like self-defense and capital punishment.
- The Quran (17:33) echoes the Torah's principle almost exactly, forbidding the killing of life God has made sacred except by right — suggesting a shared Abrahamic moral foundation.
- Rabbinic literature (Mishnah Sanhedrin) shows that even within Judaism, the application of these laws was debated, with scholars like Rabbi Akiva disagreeing on specific cases of capital punishment.
FAQs
Does 'thou shalt not kill' mean all killing, or just murder?
What does the Torah say about killing an innocent person?
Does the Quran have a similar prohibition to the Torah's commandment against killing?
Were there any exceptions to the no-killing rule in the Torah?
Judaism
Thou shalt not kill.
The Torah prohibits killing in the Decalogue: “Thou shalt not kill.” Exodus 20:13 It repeats this command in Deuteronomy, reinforcing its foundational status. Deuteronomy 5:17 It also pronounces a curse on anyone who takes a reward to slay an innocent person, underscoring the protection of innocent life. Deuteronomy 27:25 Later rabbinic discussions (not the Torah itself) show how Jewish law wrestled with edge cases and zealotry, indicating debate about application while upholding the Torah’s baseline. Mishnah Sanhedrin 9:6 Some later lists of severe offenses (karet) also frame communal gravity for related transgressions, though they address categories beyond homicide. Mishnah Keritot 1:1
Christianity
Thou shalt not kill.
Christians receive the same Torah command within their Old Testament: “Thou shalt not kill,” as reiterated in Deuteronomy’s Decalogue. Deuteronomy 5:17 The Torah also condemns killing the innocent via bribery, reflecting a concern for justice. Deuteronomy 27:25 Many Christian readings treat these as enduring moral norms grounded in the Torah’s explicit prohibitions. Exodus 20:13
Islam
Not applicable. Concerns Jewish Torah scripture; Islam addresses killing within the Qur’an rather than the Torah (e.g., Qur’an 17:33). Quran 17:33
Where they agree
Judaism and Christianity affirm the Torah’s explicit prohibition: “Thou shalt not kill,” as found in Exodus and repeated in Deuteronomy. Exodus 20:13 Deuteronomy 5:17 Both also acknowledge the Torah’s condemnation of killing the innocent through bribery. Deuteronomy 27:25
Where they disagree
| Topic | Judaism | Christianity |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Torah loci emphasized | Exodus 20:13 and Deuteronomy 5:17 cited in Jewish teaching. Exodus 20:13 Deuteronomy 5:17 | Same Old Testament passages commonly cited in Christian ethics. Exodus 20:13 Deuteronomy 5:17 |
| Justice for the innocent | Uses Deuteronomy 27:25 to stress protecting the innocent. Deuteronomy 27:25 | Appeals to the same verse for moral instruction. Deuteronomy 27:25 |
Key takeaways
- The Torah states, “Thou shalt not kill,” in the Decalogue. Exodus 20:13
- Deuteronomy reiterates the command, emphasizing its centrality. Deuteronomy 5:17
- The Torah curses taking a bribe to kill an innocent person. Deuteronomy 27:25
- Jewish rabbinic texts later debate applications while presuming the Torah’s baseline prohibition. Mishnah Sanhedrin 9:6
- Christian ethics regularly cite the same Torah verses as binding moral instruction. Exodus 20:13 Deuteronomy 5:17
FAQs
Where does the Torah state the prohibition on killing?
Does the Torah address killing the innocent through bribery?
Is the commandment repeated in more than one place?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.