What Does the Torah Say About Masturbation — and How Do Judaism, Christianity & Islam Compare?
Judaism
'Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.' — Leviticus 18:17 Leviticus 18:17
The Torah itself contains no verse that explicitly forbids masturbation. Rabbinic authorities have historically derived a prohibition — particularly for men — from the concept of hash-chatat zera, the 'destruction' or 'wasting' of seed. The classic prooftext is the story of Onan in Genesis 38, though that narrative concerns a specific covenantal obligation rather than solitary acts. The Torah's sexual legislation in Leviticus 18 focuses on prohibited relationships and the uncovering of nakedness Leviticus 18:7, not on solitary behavior, leaving interpreters to extrapolate Leviticus 18:17.
Medieval authorities like Maimonides (12th century) treated the prohibition as serious, while later Ashkenazic codes such as the Shulchan Aruch (Joseph Karo, 1563) reinforced it. The concern is framed less around a specific Torah verse and more around broader principles of sexual holiness. Deuteronomy's prohibitions on sexual immorality and the categories of toevah (abomination) Deuteronomy 18:12 are sometimes invoked as a general framework, though they do not name masturbation directly Deuteronomy 12:31.
Modern Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform authorities diverge considerably. Rabbi David Feldman's 1968 work Birth Control in Jewish Law surveyed the range of opinion and found the prohibition less absolute than often assumed, especially for women, for whom the 'wasting seed' rationale does not apply. It's fair to say there's genuine disagreement within Judaism today, and the Torah text itself doesn't settle the question.
Christianity
'Thou shalt not commit adultery.' — Exodus 20:14 Exodus 20:14
Christianity doesn't have a single authoritative ruling on masturbation, and the New Testament is as silent on the specific act as the Torah is Exodus 20:14. Early Church Fathers, drawing on the same Onan narrative and on Stoic ideas about the purpose of sexuality, condemned it strongly. Augustine (4th–5th century) and later Thomas Aquinas (13th century) classified it as contrary to natural law because it separates sexual pleasure from procreation.
The Roman Catholic Church maintains a formal prohibition, articulated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994, §2352), grounding it partly in the broader biblical call to avoid sexual immorality — a category that Deuteronomy's legislation helps define Deuteronomy 5:18. Protestant traditions are far more varied. Many Reformed and evangelical theologians acknowledge the absence of an explicit biblical text and counsel pastoral sensitivity rather than blanket condemnation.
The Torah's adultery prohibitions Exodus 20:14 and its broader framework of sexual holiness Deuteronomy 23:17 are seen by Christian interpreters as background context for New Testament ethics, but they don't resolve the masturbation question on their own. Scholars like William Webb (Slaves, Women & Homosexuals, 2001) argue for a 'redemptive-movement hermeneutic' that reads biblical sexual ethics as trajectory rather than exhaustive code, which opens space for nuanced conclusions.
Islam
'There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.' — Deuteronomy 23:17 Deuteronomy 23:17
Classical Islamic jurisprudence addresses masturbation more directly than either the Torah or the New Testament does, relying on Quranic verses about guarding one's private parts (Quran 23:5–7) and on hadith literature. The majority position among the four Sunni schools — Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali — is that masturbation is haram (forbidden) or at minimum makruh (strongly discouraged). The Hanbali school, followed by scholars like Ibn Taymiyya (14th century), permits it in cases of necessity to avoid greater sin such as fornication.
Islamic scholars don't derive this ruling from the Torah directly, but they do regard the Torah (Tawrat) as an originally revealed scripture whose moral framework overlaps with Quranic ethics Deuteronomy 23:17. The Torah's prohibitions on sexual immorality and its concept of sexual holiness Deuteronomy 18:12 are seen as consistent with Quranic teaching, even if the specific rulings differ in detail. The Quran's own sexual legislation is considered the operative standard for Muslims.
Contemporary Muslim scholars such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi (The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam, 1960) have maintained the general prohibition while acknowledging the minority permissive opinion. There's real scholarly disagreement here, and it's worth noting that no Quranic verse names masturbation explicitly — the prohibition is inferred, much as it is in Jewish and Christian tradition Deuteronomy 12:31.
Where they agree
- All three traditions hold that human sexuality is a gift that carries moral weight and requires discipline Deuteronomy 18:12.
- All three derive sexual ethics partly from the Torah's Levitical and Deuteronomic legislation, even when they interpret it differently Leviticus 18:7 Leviticus 18:17.
- None of the three traditions has an explicit, unambiguous scriptural verse that names masturbation and forbids it — all three rely on inference and interpretive tradition Exodus 20:14 Deuteronomy 5:18.
- All three traditions agree that sexual acts outside their sanctioned contexts risk spiritual harm, grounding this in the Torah's broader concept of sexual holiness Deuteronomy 12:31.
Where they disagree
| Issue | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a clear prohibition? | Rabbinic consensus leans prohibitive for men, but the Torah text is silent Leviticus 18:17 | Catholic teaching prohibits it; Protestant opinion is divided Exodus 20:14 | Majority of classical scholars prohibit it; minority permit it in necessity Deuteronomy 23:17 |
| Basis of the ruling | 'Wasting seed' principle derived from Genesis 38, not an explicit Torah verse Leviticus 18:7 | Natural law reasoning and general sexual-purity texts Deuteronomy 5:18 | Quranic verses on guarding private parts, supported by hadith Deuteronomy 18:12 |
| Does it apply equally to women? | Most authorities say the prohibition is weaker or absent for women Leviticus 18:17 | Catholic teaching applies it equally; Protestant views vary Exodus 20:14 | Classical scholars generally extend the ruling to women Deuteronomy 23:17 |
| Severity of the act | Serious but not among the gravest sins in most rabbinic frameworks Deuteronomy 12:31 | Classified as gravely disordered in Catholic teaching; less severe in most Protestant frameworks Exodus 20:14 | Haram under majority opinion, but lesser than fornication; some schools say only makruh Deuteronomy 18:12 |
Key takeaways
- The Torah contains no explicit verse forbidding masturbation — the prohibition in Jewish law is rabbinic and inferential, not a direct Torah commandment Leviticus 18:7.
- All three Abrahamic traditions derive their sexual ethics partly from Torah legislation (Leviticus 18, Deuteronomy 23), but none finds masturbation named there Deuteronomy 23:17 Leviticus 18:17.
- Islam's classical majority prohibits masturbation more consistently than either Jewish or Protestant Christian tradition, though all three acknowledge scholarly disagreement Deuteronomy 18:12.
- The 'wasting seed' argument used in Jewish and Catholic reasoning applies primarily to men, creating an asymmetry that modern scholars like Rabbi David Feldman have highlighted Leviticus 18:17.
- Across all three faiths, the absence of an explicit scriptural text means the debate is ultimately about interpretive authority — who gets to define what the silence of scripture implies Deuteronomy 12:31.
FAQs
Does the Torah explicitly forbid masturbation?
Why do some Jewish authorities permit masturbation while others forbid it?
How does Islam's position differ from the Torah's approach?
Do all three religions agree on anything about sexual ethics?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.