What Questions to Ask When Studying the Bible: A Three-Faith Perspective

0

AI-generated answers. Same retrieval, same compare prompt, multiple models — compare across tabs. Every citation links to a primary source.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) · 2026-05-12 · same retrieved passages, same compare-format prompt

TL;DR: All three Abrahamic traditions value deep, disciplined inquiry into sacred text. Judaism and Christianity treat Bible study as a core spiritual discipline, with both traditions urging believers to ask who, what, why, and how questions of the text—and to ask what God requires in response. Islam doesn't use the Bible as primary scripture, but the Qur'an itself affirms the value of scriptural learning and divine questioning. Across traditions, the best Bible study questions probe context, meaning, personal application, and obedience.

Judaism

"Go, inquire of GOD on my behalf and on behalf of those who remain in Israel and Judah concerning the words of the scroll that has been found, for great indeed must be GOD's wrath that has been poured down upon us because our ancestors did not obey the word of GOD and do all that is written in this scroll." — 2 Chronicles 34:21 (JPS Tanakh) 2 Chronicles 34:21

Jewish tradition has always treated scripture study (talmud Torah) as an act of worship, not merely academic exercise. The rabbis didn't just read a text—they interrogated it. So what questions should a serious student bring to the Bible?

1. What does the text actually say?

Start with the plain meaning, called peshat. King Josiah's scribes modeled this when they discovered the scroll of the Torah and immediately asked what it prescribed: "because our ancestors did not obey the words of this scroll to do all that has been prescribed for us" 2 Kings 22:13. The first question is always: what is written, and what does it demand?

2. What is God's word on this matter?

Jeremiah 23:37 frames a direct, personal question to bring to any prophetic or scriptural text: "What did GOD answer you?" or "What did GOD speak?" Jeremiah 23:37. This pushes the student beyond intellectual curiosity toward relational inquiry—what is God actually communicating here?

3. Is this claim true and certain?

Deuteronomy 13:14 commands the Israelites to "enquire, and make search, and ask diligently" before drawing conclusions Deuteronomy 13:14. The Hebrew roots here—darash (to seek out), chaqar (to examine closely), and sha'al (to ask)—form a three-step investigative method that medieval commentator Rashi and later scholars like Nachmanides (13th century) built entire hermeneutical frameworks around.

4. What does this mean for the community, not just me?

Notice that King Josiah's inquiry in 2 Chronicles 34:21 was communal: "Go, inquire of GOD on my behalf and on behalf of those who remain in Israel and Judah" 2 Chronicles 34:21. Jewish study is inherently communal—chevruta (paired study) asks: what does this text demand of us together?

5. What are the deeper and allegorical layers?

The classical Jewish framework PaRDeS—Peshat (plain), Remez (allegorical), Derash (homiletical), Sod (mystical)—encourages students to ask all four types of questions of every passage. Scholars like Abraham ibn Ezra (12th century) insisted no single layer exhausts a text's meaning.

Christianity

"And he asked the scribes, What question ye with them?" — Mark 9:16 (KJV) Mark 9:16

Christian Bible study methodology has been shaped by centuries of hermeneutical tradition—from Origen's allegorical method (3rd century) to the Reformation's sola scriptura emphasis on grammatical-historical reading, to modern evangelical approaches like inductive Bible study. All of them, though, circle back to a core set of questions.

1. What is the context—historical, literary, and cultural?

Good Bible study asks: who wrote this, to whom, and when? This is the foundation of the grammatical-historical method championed by scholars like Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart in their influential 1981 work How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. Without context, interpretation drifts.

2. What is being disputed or questioned in the text itself?

Even Jesus modeled this. In Mark 9:16, he turned to the scribes and asked directly: "What question ye with them?" Mark 9:16. Asking what the debate or tension is within a passage—what problem the text is solving—unlocks meaning that surface reading misses.

3. What does this text demand of me?

The same urgency found in Josiah's discovery of the scroll applies to Christian reading. When the text was found, the question wasn't merely intellectual—it was: "our ancestors did not obey the words of this scroll to do all that has been prescribed for us" 2 Kings 22:13. Christian hermeneutics, especially in the Reformed tradition, insists every passage has a use—doctrinal, corrective, or practical.

4. How does this passage fit the whole biblical narrative?

Canonical criticism, associated with Brevard Childs (20th century), asks: how does this text function within the larger canon? New Testament writers constantly asked this of Old Testament passages.

5. Is my interpretation true and verifiable?

Deuteronomy 13:14's command to "enquire, and make search, and ask diligently" Deuteronomy 13:14 is echoed in the Berean model of Acts 17—checking claims against scripture carefully. Don't accept a reading just because it's familiar.

There's genuine disagreement among Christian scholars about which questions take priority. Charismatics emphasize what is the Spirit saying through this text now? while Reformed scholars emphasize what did the original author intend? Both questions have their place, but the order matters to each camp.

Islam

"Or do you have a scripture in which you learn" — Qur'an 68:37 (Sahih International) Quran 68:37

Islam doesn't treat the Bible as a primary authoritative scripture—Muslims hold that the Qur'an is the final, preserved revelation, and that earlier scriptures were subject to alteration (tahrif). So the specific practice of "studying the Bible" isn't a normative Islamic discipline. That said, the Qur'an does engage directly with the idea of scriptural learning and divine questioning.

Qur'an 68:37 poses a rhetorical challenge: "Or do you have a scripture in which you learn" Quran 68:37—implying that legitimate knowledge must come from authentic divine revelation. This verse, in context, is questioning those who make claims without proper scriptural grounding.

More broadly, the Qur'an in 15:92 affirms that all people will be held accountable for their engagement with divine guidance: "Them, by thy Lord, We shall question, every one" Quran 15:92. This frames the ultimate question of any scripture study not as academic but eschatological—what will you answer when questioned?

Classical Islamic scholars like al-Tabari (9th–10th century) did engage with biblical texts through the lens of isra'iliyyat (Israelite traditions), but always subordinated them to Qur'anic authority. For Muslims curious about the Bible, the questions they'd be encouraged to ask are: does this align with what the Qur'an confirms, and does it contradict established Islamic teaching?

Where they agree

Across all three traditions, a few core principles emerge about what makes scripture study genuine rather than superficial:

  • Diligent inquiry is commanded, not optional. Deuteronomy 13:14's triple imperative—enquire, search, ask diligently Deuteronomy 13:14—reflects a shared Abrahamic conviction that lazy reading is spiritually dangerous.
  • The text demands a response. Whether it's Josiah asking what obedience looks like 2 Chronicles 34:21, Jesus asking what the dispute is really about Mark 9:16, or the Qur'an warning that all will be questioned Quran 15:92, scripture study that doesn't lead to action or accountability is considered incomplete.
  • Community matters. Jewish chevruta, Christian small-group study, and Islamic halaqah circles all reflect the shared intuition that the best questions about sacred text are asked together, not alone.

Where they disagree

Question/IssueJudaismChristianityIslam
Is the Bible authoritative as-is?Yes—the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is fully authoritativeYes—Old and New Testaments are fully authoritativePartially—the Bible is considered corrupted; the Qur'an supersedes it
What's the primary question to ask?What does God require of the community? 2 Chronicles 34:21What did the original author intend, and how does it apply? Mark 9:16Does this align with Qur'anic revelation? Quran 68:37
How many layers of meaning?Four (PaRDeS framework)Varies—Reformed tradition favors one primary meaning; Catholic tradition allows multiple sensesNot applicable to Bible study specifically
Who can authoritatively interpret?Trained rabbis, but all Jews are obligated to studyVaries widely—from magisterium (Catholic) to individual believer (Protestant)Qualified Islamic scholars (ulama), not individual laypeople for the Bible

Key takeaways

  • Jewish tradition commands a three-part investigative method—enquire, search, ask diligently (Deuteronomy 13:14)—that forms the basis of serious Bible study Deuteronomy 13:14.
  • Both Judaism and Christianity frame scripture study as communal and action-oriented: King Josiah's question was on behalf of the whole people, not just himself 2 Chronicles 34:21.
  • Jesus modeled question-based engagement with scripture, asking 'What question ye with them?' before drawing conclusions (Mark 9:16) Mark 9:16.
  • Islam doesn't treat Bible study as a normative practice, but affirms that all people will be questioned about their engagement with divine guidance (Qur'an 15:92) Quran 15:92.
  • The best Bible study questions operate on multiple levels: historical context, plain meaning, community application, and personal obedience—a framework present in both the Jewish PaRDeS method and Christian hermeneutical traditions.

FAQs

What is the most important question to ask when studying the Bible?
Most Jewish and Christian scholars agree the foundational question is: what does this text actually say, and what does it require? King Josiah modeled this when he asked what God's word demanded of the people after the scroll was found 2 Kings 22:13. From there, questions of context, meaning, and application follow naturally.
Should Bible study questions focus on personal application or historical meaning?
There's genuine scholarly disagreement here. The Reformed tradition (e.g., John Calvin, 16th century) insists historical meaning comes first—you can't apply what you haven't understood. But Jeremiah 23:37 frames the question personally: "What did GOD answer you?" or "What did GOD speak?" Jeremiah 23:37—suggesting personal reception of the word is also a legitimate question to bring.
Does Islam encourage studying the Bible?
Not as a primary spiritual discipline. The Qur'an questions whether people have a scripture "in which you learn" Quran 68:37, implying that authentic learning requires authentic scripture. Classical scholars like al-Tabari engaged with biblical material cautiously, always subordinating it to Qur'anic authority. Muslims are generally encouraged to study the Qur'an first and foremost.
How does Deuteronomy 13:14 model good Bible study method?
It commands a three-step investigative process: enquire (darash), make search (chaqar), and ask diligently (sha'al) Deuteronomy 13:14. This Hebrew triad—seek, examine, question—forms the basis of what later Jewish and Christian scholars would develop into formal hermeneutical methods. It's essentially an ancient call for evidence-based, careful interpretation.
What did Jesus model about asking questions of scripture?
In Mark 9:16, Jesus didn't lecture—he asked: "What question ye with them?" Mark 9:16. This Socratic move, identifying the core dispute first, is a method many Christian educators like Howard Hendricks (20th century) built entire Bible study curricula around. Understanding the question a text is answering is often more important than jumping to conclusions.

0 Community answers

No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.

Your answer

Log in or sign up to post a community answer.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated before publishing. Cite a source when you can — that's what makes this site useful.

0/2000